Hosting architecture · server migration
Find the right hosting architecture for your business.
Dedicated, virtualised or private cloud is an architecture decision, not a price comparison. Getting it the wrong way round is why migrations cost more than they should.
Plan a migration Contact: hosting or migration questions
Independent reference for the people who buy and run infrastructure. No supplier is recommended here, and no prices or uptime figures are quoted.
- A · DedicatedOne workload per physical server, with local disks.Trade-off accepted: capacity is bought in whole servers, so headroom sits idle and growth means new hardware.
- B · VirtualisedVirtual machines share one host, through a hypervisor layer, and one storage array.Trade-off accepted: a host or storage fault now touches several workloads at once unless redundancy is built in.
- C · Private cloudA pool of hosts, placed and scaled by an orchestration layer.Trade-off accepted: elasticity is limited to the pool you provisioned, and the platform itself must be operated.
The position
Choose the architecture, then the supplier.
Dedicated, virtualised or private cloud decides who controls what, how capacity grows and what one failure can take down. A supplier can only deliver the architecture you chose, so settle that first.
- Control
- Highest on dedicated hardware. Under private cloud it moves from machines to policy.
- Elasticity
- Slow on dedicated servers, quicker on virtualised hosts, highest on a pool, and always bounded by what was provisioned.
- Failure domain
- One server, a host with its shared storage, or a design choice. Know which before you sign.
Moving
A migration is five stages, and the last one is how you leave.
Most failed moves skip the unglamorous first two stages or never rehearse the fifth. The server migration guide covers each one, and the planner shows the transfer arithmetic.
Failure domains
One fault. How far does it travel?
The same three workloads, W1 to W3, in each architecture, and the same single fault. The architecture decides the blast radius, which is why the table below has a row for it.
A Dedicated
B Virtualised
C Private cloud
Fig. 3 · illustration of a general pattern, not a customer environment. Not to scale.
The decision, compressed
Three architectures, five questions
The same requirements, answered three different ways. These are qualitative statements about the architecture classes, not claims about any product. The full comparison matrix adds colocation and public cloud and shows how to weight each row.
| Question | Dedicated | Virtualised | Private cloud |
|---|---|---|---|
| What you buy | Whole physical servers. | Capacity on shared hosts, divided into virtual machines. | A pool of resources plus the automation that allocates it. |
| Control | Highest: hardware, firmware, operating system and storage layout are yours to choose. | High at the guest. At the host, only as much as the host’s owner allows. | Moves from machines to policy: quotas, placement rules and templates. |
| Elasticity | Slow. More capacity means more hardware. | Moderate. New machines are quick while host headroom lasts. | Highest of the three, bounded by the pool that was provisioned. |
| Failure domain | One server, unless you build a cluster. | A host or its shared storage, taking several workloads with it. | Set by design (pool, rack, site). The platform layer is a new failure domain. |
| Trade-off accepted | Idle headroom is paid for, and growth is stepwise. | Shared dependencies concentrate risk unless redundancy is built in. | The platform needs operating, and capacity still has a ceiling. |
Where to start
Start from the question you are actually asking
01
Choosing
Which architecture fits?
Settle control, elasticity, failure domains and licensing before comparing suppliers.
02
Moving
How do we migrate safely?
Discovery, dependency mapping, seeding, cutover and rollback, with the transfer arithmetic shown.
03
Keeping it running
What protects us, and who runs it?
High availability, backup and disaster recovery are three different things. So are a supplier and a partner.
Planning a move? Work through the numbers first.
The migration readiness planner is a rule-based questionnaire. It shows the transfer arithmetic and the questions to settle, and it is not an audit of your systems.